wakenbake22 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

watch?v=AWuvGoKdWFMRight wing up, left wing down like the ASCE report claims, based on a few witness statements (and ignoring all the others, some claim right down, left up, some claim level).When the left wing hits, the plane spins. To fit the light pole path and the hole at column 14, the plane at the Pentagon flies straight without any slight turn at all.So how does the generator get hit and moved, but the plane not spin? 100 ft from the building.

wakenbake22 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Photos of Bigfoot, is that proof?So why are photos of debris, scraps of fuselage skin that were carried out and could've been carried in and planted. None of this was inspected or identified or matched to flight 77. No luggage, bodies in seats, tail section with numbers that would prove it was flight 77. Nothing like that at all.The crash physics make no sense, the damage doesn't fit a 757.The Dod report shows missing columns far from the plane impact path, proving a cover up.

wakenbake22 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

No, flying a 500 mph doesn't make "anything possible" and wouldn't change the length of the wingspan, idiot.It is not possible, the engine couldn't bump the top of the generator like you alone are claiming. ASCE report says wing hit, not engine.Again, the lack of damage from the 30 ft steel tail over the hole is what I am talking about, not a column, moron.Check the Metcalf photos, the Riskus photos. Also, I never said "no debris"

WhyAskQuestions (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Have you taken your medication at all today Waken?

WhyAskQuestions (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"How does the engine bump the top of the generator without putting the left wing 30 ft into the ground?"At 500 mph anythings possible."So you must be wrong."And you still haven't proven me wrong for over 3 weeks. Hmmm! "A proven moron, whyask is now out to prove he is a coward as well."Only a moron would go on ranting about a stupid column and telling everyone that it wasn't Flt. 77, when it was with photographic proof of it.Can you provide photos with no debris Waken?

wakenbake22 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

whyask, sorry, I didn't see that you are your source for your claim that the engine hit the generator, because of some photo you looked at. So you believe the ASCE report is wrong? ok.How does the engine bump the top of the generator without putting the left wing 30 ft into the ground? It can't. So you must be wrong.Still, how does the engine move the generator without breaking off?

wakenbake22 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

No damage from the steel tail above the hole at column 14 is more proof it was not a 757. -----But whyask questions only used this part"column 14 is more proof it was not a 757"Then goes on a rant about truthers and the grassy knoll. A proven moron, whyask is now out to prove he is a coward as well.The steel tail, that would reach 30 ft above the hole, but no damage at all from this steel tail.But the aluminum left wing destroys 50 ft of the first floor? No. No 757 hit.

wakenbake22 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

whyaskIs a picture of Bigfoot proof? Is a picture of a UFO real evidence that aliens visit Earth? That is what you believe.

wakenbake22 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

It was hit by the right engine not the wing. -------The ASCE report says wing. What is your source?There is damage to the top few inches of the generator, not from a 9 ft engine.

WhyAskQuestions (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Besides there's enough phyical and photographic proof that it was American Airlines Flight 77 that hit the Pentagon. What's that old saying?"A picture is worth a thousand words."