Search:

Get Your Own Website Like Mine and Learn How to Make Money!

This simple self updating page brings in enough to fund my real online income and keep it growing.

That's not all you get as a member of our team.
Click Here to Learn More!

Why Intelligent Design is WRONG, Part I

Weight Loss Humor
Weight Loss Humor Weight Loss Humor
Weight Loss Humor

READ THISThis video is NOT meant to be an accurate representation of evolution, as evolution does not have a predetermined goal (though there is the goal to reproduce). This video is meant to test one simple point, that RANDOM MUTATION + NON-RANDOM SELECTION = VERY IMPROBABLE RESULT. For further discussion on the use of a "goal" see below. For simulations that represent evolution more accurately see my later videos.In this video I show why the central tenant of Intelligent Design or ID is wrong. They argue they can tell when an object is "designed", meaning it could not have arisen by chance, but their logic is fatally flawed. Here I will actually simulate evolution showing how impossibly improbable outcomes can appear quite easily, without anything being designed.For those who fail to find solace in the fact that I have used a "goal" image in this video I will 1) offer a quaint explanation for how this DOES NOT impose design and 2) direct you to Part II of this video.See, imagine there is an ecosystem where two species live in a symbiotic relationship. Species A offers food to species B for protection. The way species A recognizes species B is because B looks like SouthPark characters. Now species C happens to also live in this environment but looks nothing like SouthPark characters. They resemble random noise. They go about collecting their food on their own. Evolution by natural selection and common sense tells us that any member of species C that has an advantage in collecting food will be better off (more energy and time for reproduction). Thus that advantage will be passed on. Therefore, random mutations in species C's population that make members very slightly resemble SouthPark characters will be passed on because those organisms might be able to trick a member of species A every now and then more so than those that are just random noise. As mutations build up in the population of species C, they begin to resemble SouthPark characters more and more, thus tricking species A more and more getting free food and increasing their fitness.Mimicry like this happens all the time in nature. The evolution of species C is not designed or directed. It just happens that those that resemble species B more (thus looking like a SouthPark character) will have a higher fitness. It is a product of their environment. They will pass on those mutations and the population will evolve.To download this video go to: http://www.mediafire.com/?8vz1... you wish to translate this video you can download the PowerPoint file from: http://www.mediafire.com/?azkw... the facts, spread the truth, and most importantly, Think About It.

Channel: Howto & Style
Uploaded: November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am
Author: cdk007

Length: 04:18
Rating: 4.25
Views: 121189

Tags: Creation  Creationism  Data  Debate  Design  Education  Evolution  Evolve  Experiment  Facts  ID  Intelligent  Park  South  Wrong  

Video Url:


Embed Code:

Video Comments

Andylocksigma (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"Intelligent Design is far more logical than stupid evolution."So what predictions does your idea predict?
answerme33 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
jtyranusYou said that "Intelligent Design" may be responsible for the "causation" of the Universe, but that it is not needed for natural processes of evolution, and that everything else can come about from these processes. OK. If that's true, what happened to the "Intelligent Design" after the Universe was caused to exist? Did You become a human being through a process that was not "intelligent"? Hahahahahahahah.
answerme33 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
IntelligentDesignRunning down into complete disorder? Just like the theory of Evolution and its mixed-up scientists, who would rather commit suicide then to admit Intelligent Design. Intelligent Design is far more logical than stupid evolution. Intelligent Design doesn't leave one with a blank mind at the end of the day, evolution does. Intelligent Design Forever.
answerme33 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
IntelligentDivineYour comments are quite good and really"pisses" off the Evolutionists because they get "stuck" for rational or logical answers.No matter how rational or sensible an answer one presents to them, their mixed-up science always leaves them with a "BLANK" at the end of the day. Cheers! Keep up the good work.
jtyranus (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"so then what does "Evolution" believe is the source of life?"firs answer this. what does gravitation believe about anyting?the origin of life itself is not of any consequence to evolution. god created the first life form, the FSM did it or it was through chemical abiogenesis.
jtyranus (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"Are you now saying that Intelligent Design could be True?"maybe for the causation for the universe. as for everything else there is very little need for intelligent design as natural processes are perfectly capable. like evolution was perfectly capable of causing the diversity of life.
answerme33 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
jtyranusOf course "Intelligent Design" is not Science (as you say). You also say "No-one says that it can't". People do however. Are you now saying that Intelligent Design could be True? Intelligent Design is not Science because Intelligent Design is "MORE INTELLIGENT" than Science. Hahahahhahahahaha
answerme33 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
jtyranusI understand what you are saying (and the distinction, ie. the what happened afters).You know by now what my question is going to be! Big Bang? Cause? I know, God said "BANG" and it was. I'll give you evidence of His existence in some depth in a later post - watch this space.
answerme33 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
jtyranusSo, you say "Evolution" claims it is not the source of life, so then what does "Evolution" believe is the source of life??? Whether "missing links" is an outdated term or not, the fact remains. What are the"plenty" of links found supporting the Evolution theory - examples please! AND don't choose ones that Creationists have discovered.
answerme33 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
MrScorpio1234If you read the comments on this subject correctly, you will see that I am not the one who has the problem, the problem lies with those who can't provide the answers to my questions - and neither can you by the look of your 2-line comment. Who is "WE"? Speak for yourself, not others. Yes, it was an act of an omnipotent being, and that being is called GOD ALMIGHTY. Scared???

Weight Loss Humor © 2007 All Rights Reserved.